A consolidated reply of experiences and examples shared by various members of the Solution Exchange Water Community
I work for ActionAid International in Bangladesh as DIPECHO (Disaster Preparedness ECHO) Project Manager. The objective of the project is to "Enhance Disaster Preparedness among Communities and Institutions in Bangladesh". One of the major activities of the current project is
For this project we want incorporate learning from similar work that has already been done by different agencies and incorporate the lessons. Also, this is an action research initiative and after the project we will publish a strategy paper on construction of Flood Shelters. This will be relevant to other countries especially India.
In view of the above, we request members of the Disaster Management and Water community to advice on four very critical issues of:
Members are also requested to provide any
We sincerely hope that the complete report of our study will be a good reference for humanitarian agencies across countries. Contributions from the Solution Exchange Community will be acknowledged in the strategy paper.
Thanks and best regards
*Offline Contribution
User communities play a critical role in designing, building and maintaining emergency shelters for use during floods, cyclones and other natural disasters. The authorities can consider several factors during site selection, equipment for the shelter, facilities, maintenance options and local institutions for managing the shelter. These will add to the utility of the shelters and make it easy for local people to take care of the facilities. They will also help integrate the shelters into the lives of the people.
An ideal site for a shelter must be located higher than the highest flood level recorded in the past. If there is no suitable high ground, the authorities can consider building the shelter on stilts of concrete or steel. This type of shelter has an additional advantage: People can use the space under the shelter to keep their livestock during emergencies. In several floods, people have had to sell of their livestock for a pittance because they were unable to look after them.
The user communities can help select the best site. Other factors that determine site selection are the distance (it should be within 2 Km of the habitations it serves) and road access. There should be no geographical barrier between the habitations and the shelter. In coastal Orissa, several of the flood shelters have been built within the premises of schools; this eliminates the need for finding and acquiring land and also ensures the shelter’s upkeep.
The site needs to be firm and rocky, not marshy. Soil analysis can help determine this, and also help to select a site suitable for an earthquake resistant building.
The shelter building can ideally have a cement foundation, and a brick-and-mortar construction up to the plinth level. The authorities can make a ramp to make the shelter disabled-friendly, as the Lutheran World Service has done in
The shelter design should provide for separate halls for women and men in addition to the obvious need for separate toilets and bathing areas. The authorities can also include some additional facilities for women while equipping the shelter, such as sanitary napkins and adequate lighting in toilets, bath rooms and the water source. Toilet designs for girls and women now include disposal facilities for used sanitary napkins. A part of the shelter can function as an anganwadi (for children aged 3-6 years) and a school for older children, as the Centre for Social Audit, Social Inclusion and Governance tried in Araria,
Several responses emphasized the need to safeguard drinking water sources. Tanks for storing water have to be above the flood water level, or sealed so flood water does not contaminate it. Rainwater harvesting can provide drinking water where no other source is available. The survival kit in shelters can include water disinfection facility such as chlorine or halogen tablets so the water is safe to drink. Additionally, adequate sanitation is essential to reduce the risk of water borne diseases during floods.
The authorities can involve local people right from the stage of selecting the site. In
Another example of community participation in constructing and maintaining flood shelters include the Mising tribe who live in the flood plains of the Brahmaputra in the Lakhimpur and Dhemaji districts of
The second example is from the Nadia and Murshidabad districts of
Members suggested local self-help groups can look after the shelters. Alternately, a committee comprising people from the community and local administration can maintain the shelter. The authorities can provide a core grant and the committee can raise additional resources by letting out the shelter for social functions. Other sources of revenue can include using the shelter as an anganwadi, school or camp for medical treatment, on payment of a fee. These measures will also ensure the shelter is in continuous use and ready to serve its primary function during an emergency. The committee or SHG is also responsible for ensuring the state of readiness of the equipment in the shelter.
In Tamilnadu during the Tsunami Response Programme, an organization constructed several emergency shelters for the affected community. They constructed high level tube well platforms to protect them from flood water contamination. Ramps were provided for the physically challenged population. They also provided battery charged minimum lighting system to ensure safety of the vulnerable group.
From Dipankar Dasgupta, DISHA, Kolkota
To prepare against annual floods, the tribes living in the flood plains have raised their houses built on stilts at a level higher than the flood level, have kept boats tied to their houses and have switched over to fishing during floods and to agriculture during Rabi season. They have built large raised earthen mounds to build markets and other community structures which are also used as flood shelters. The construction and maintenance of the shelters is done completely through community participation.
After a devastating flood in 2004, through a community-centred process, all houses destroyed and other common shelters were rebuilt on raised plinths above the highest flood level. Using local material houses were especially designed so that on receipt of early warning they can be dismantled and put it on top of very tall, strong trees on bamboo platforms and families then can proceed to their respective identified shelters or live during the floods in raised scaffolds (locally called 'machans').
In Orrisa, as preparedness to cyclones two storey multi-purpose buildings were constructed for community use. During normal period it was used for various activities. It helped keeping in usable condition during a disaster. The technical designs were assessed through field survey taking into account parameters like floor space available, population of the villages etc. Community participated in site selection also supervised the construction. These buildings have all basic facilities for shelter of women, children and others
After the floods in 2008 the Government supported Relief Camps for pro essential supplies and private relief camps were managed by the social, religious and cultural organizations. Various faith based and other community groups were the first to reach and rescue people from the heavy flow of the waters with the help of other community members.
Guidelines; National Disaster Management Authority; New Delhi
Available at: http://ndma.gov.in/ndma/guidelines/Book.pdf (Pdf 5.75 MB)
The guidelines suggest criteria
Paper; DFID, EC, UNDP and the World Bank; 2002
Available at: http://www.sarpn.org.za/wssd/protagonists/pr_em/WSSD_Paper_Final_Version.pdf (Pdf 134 KB)
Paper was produced in the process leading up to the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) talks about constructing flood shelters.
Oxfam Supporter Relations, Oxfam House, John Smith Drive, Cowley, Oxford, OX4 2JY
Then with UNICEF, Manish supported the preparation of the flood
NDMA Bhawan, A-1, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029; Tel: 26701700; www.ndma.gov.in
Institution envisages empowerment of all stakeholders for improving the effectiveness of Disaster Management; has prepared Guidelines for flood management in the country
Pataliputra Colony, Patna 800 013, Bihar; Tel: +91 0612 2275-722, 2261-621, 2261-728, 2275-720 ; Fax: 0612 2262-620; patna@unicef.org; http://www.unicef.org/wes/index_emergency.html
UNICEF Bihar prepared a Manual on Flood Shelters in Bihar, which can be referred to for issues related to flood shelter and community participation
Red Cross Bhawan, Golf Links, New Delhi 110003; Tel: +91-11-24618915; 24611756; Fax: +91-11-24617531; indcrossbr@vsnl.net; http://www.indianredcross.org/program.htm
Indian Red cross has constructed a quite a few shelters and they are using it as anganvadi in peace time hence maintenance of the shelters is not a problem
D-2, Keshav Apartment, Memnagar, Ahmedabad - 380 052; http://sepindia.org/
Works in the field of Emergency Response and Disaster Preparedness (Habitat Development) ; prepared Cyclone shelter designs in Gujarat
Rajiv Bhawan, Unit-5, Bhubaneswar, Orissa 751001; Tel: 0674-2395398/79; Fax: 0674-2391871/6681;
http://v3.osdma.org/ViewDetails.aspx?vchglinkid=GL000&vchplinkid=PL000&vchslinkid=SL000
The authority adopted strategies for involving communities & other stakeholders in maintenance of shelters in the state
Kharagpur 721 302; 91-3222-255221; +91-3222-255303; http://www.iitkgp.ac.in/
Conducted research and suggested locations for Cyclone Shelters in 370 locations and ideas on construction of Cyclone Shelters in Orissa
Red Cross Building Red Cross Road, New Delhi 110001; Tel: 91-112-371-64-24; indcross@vsnl.com
http://www.ifrc.org/what/disasters/response/tsunamis/index.asp
IFRC has developed Shelter maintenance guidelines based on traditional knowledge and availability of local material for constructing shelter
84, Dr. Suresh Sarkar Road, Kolkata 700014 West Bengal; Tel: 91-33-22849200; Fax: 91-33-22443062; lwsi@vsnl.com ; http://www.lwsi.org/html/proj-costal_orisa-tamil.html
Have have constructed several emergency shelters for the Tsuanmi affected and also flood affected community in Cuddalore and Nagapattinam Districts of Tamilandu State
Issued 29 May 2007. Available at
Shares experiences for improving preparedness and community participation levels for efficient management of disasters
Issue Date: 12 October 2007
Brings out experiences and suggestions for making a multi-hazard shelter strategy for Assam and explores various construction and architectural designs
Available at: ftp://ftp.solutionexchange.net.in/public/drm/cr/cr-se-drm-13090701.pdf (Size: 114 KB)
I am not an expert in these matters (having spent all of my adult life working in dry land areas) but would nevertheless like to make a commonsense suggestion based on what my grandfather, who was a both a civil engineer and a partition refugee from Bangladesh, had to say about flood protection systems there.
In most parts of flood prone Bangladesh it is difficult to find naturally elevated areas. In times of severe floods the whole area becomes like a massive lake stretching miles on end. Even if elevated areas may be found they may be too far away from habitations to make it feasible for people to reach shelters built on them. So houses used to be built on stilts to provide flood protection. I think this is the most sensible approach. Shelters should be built in central locations in habitations so that they are easily accessible even to the disabled, very young and very old, on strong reinforced concrete or steel stilts whichever material is cheaper and more resilient to water erosion. The actual architectural and structural design will depend on the people's preferences, local conditions and the budget available. Some good quality solid and liquid waste recycling systems, regardless of the expense involved, should also be installed in these shelters as disposal of waste and sourcing of potable water becomes a serious health issue at times of floods.
India I was involved in preparing Manual on Flood Shelters in Bihar for UNICEF Patna (Bihar) office last year, which covered many of the issues you have mentioned.
You can contact UNICEF Patna office: Mr. S N Singh or Mr. Manish Agrawal (Now with Oxfam Bangladesh) for more details.
In India there are many such shelters constructed in flood prone and cyclone prone areas. Most of the shelters are useful during disasters and people are accommodated during the evacuation and relief phase. The shelters are constructed in a elevated areas safe from flooding and cyclones. Indian Red cross has constructed a quite a few shelters and they are using it as anganvadi in peace time hence maintenance of the shelters is not a problem. For more information on design and dimensions you can contact the Indian Redcross society head quarters. http://www.indianredcross.org/
My Comments:
Some above causes which affect houses. So please try structural techniques to avoid the above issues during construction work. Also requesting members to give valuable suggestion
Greetings from Society for Environment Protection (SEP)
Below are few of the points which are based on our experience with Cyclone shelter designs. Hope they are useful.
It is utmost important that cyclone shelter are integrated with Community based Disaster preparedness plan and exercises. If the remaining follow up loop is not done creating merely a structure will not help in Disaster preparedness. It is must to integrate it with a larger program of disaster preparedness.
Regarding what are the
For the second question on how can the
Community participation should be kept in construction monitoring also.
Many thanks for the response. One of the interesting things that you mentioned is
Sometimes we feel that this is more based on the trends of the flood in the past but how can we be futuristic keeping the impact of climate change (read water level rise) in mind? Can we have a flood shelter which has the flexibility to be raised in future if there is more water than what was forecasted? It would be nice to hear the views of the solution exchange members on these points also.
I work for Intellecap, an advisory firm that works to catalyse the growth of social enterprises. We are working on a project to engage the private sector in building the urban poor's resilience to the impacts (direct and indirect) of climate change - such as flooding, cyclones, related health issues, solid waste and water management, etc.
To this end, like Mr Nabi, we are very interested in understanding if there are successful examples of revenue models to sustain shelters and other facilities that help in disaster preparedness. Can alternative uses (anganvadis, etc.) make it a sustainable venture, or are these facilities bound to require government or NGO funding?
I would like to share the experience of Flood/ Cyclone shelter those are constructed in Orissa by different agencies and even by OSDMA (Orissa State Disaster Mitigation Authority). Especially OSDMA adopted some processes/ strategies for involving the peripheral communities & other stakeholders in maintenance of shelters, though community have not directly involved in designing & construction of the shelters. Each shelter has a
Lastly,
The problem of rise in flood water level and the subsequent impact of global warming need to be addressed on permanent basis. We have similar problem in Srinagar, Kashmir. The problem has been solved by generating floating residential shelters (Donga boats sophisticated version of which are House boats) which take care of both receding and rising flood water levels.
For further discussion I am available.
Please visit emergency shelters constructed at tsunami hit area. Some of them are locked to avoid misuse. One will get first hand information about practical difficulties in constructing and maintaining them.
Don't restrict your discussion to government officials alone. Speak to both the ruling party and opposition party in such villages.
A large number of organizations have been working in the flood prone areas of eastern Uttar Pradesh and North Bihar. Lessons from the same would be of great use to you.
Sharing some reflections on the design of flood shelters:
Site finalisation is a critical activity and due diligence must be exercised. Whether the site is common/government lands, or donated private land, all necessary paper work needs to be in place as per the law of the land before commencing work.
The site should not be low-lying. Access routes should be preferably be raised above 50 year high flood level and connected to the nearest high road/path. site should be hard/rocky and should not be marshy or landfill site- local people are the best source and cane be guides to possible good sites, however triangulation of information must be done.
Soil tests can be undertaken if needed.
The site should be within walkable distance from all the communities it seeks to serve, so that people can walk to safety on receiving flood/cyclone warning.
Overall geographical vulnerability of the area should be known to assess the liquefaction potential. Foundation design and design of structure should address this.
Drinking water is definitely a concern in times of floods. Rainwater is one friendly source of water in these times when one presumes that most water sources will be submerged/ or access difficult. Therefore, certain amount of rain water storage structures should be incorporated into the design of these structures. Gender segregated toilets and bathing rooms should be provided with water supply in place.
The community should be involved in the design of the structure, their aspirations and preferences addressed. Considering that the community are the users of these structures, their views must be taken into developing a brief for the structure and subsequent designs shared for their merits. Involving an architect/ civil engineer early on into the process helps a great deal. Even in a tender procedure where an outside party is to do the construction, members of the community with interest/knowledge of construction can serve as the eyes and ears to the process.
During the time that construction of the shelter is being carried out, is a good time to initiate dissemination of safe construction practices.
This has been done with a certain measure of success by IRCS in Orissa. Even the shaded plinth serves as a day school. The covered lockable space is used for marriages, functions etc, used for community meetings, schools, etc
Every family should contribute every month based on their paying capacity. These go into not only the running of the structure but also maintainance of warning equipment, S&R equipment etc. However, in the long run, these structures should be linked with panchayat/local government/local chapter of Red Cross.
Before the onset of disaster season, the community should be mobilised and the entire structure serviced from the roof downwards including water inlets and outlets, making sure sanitation facilities are working, warning equipment are in good condition, door and window latches are in order etc.
Many thanks for giving your input.
One of the issues that you have mentioned is Soil Testing. Could you please share your wisdom on the same. Like testing for what? Is it for the strength and compaction?
>From its appearance it looks like the soil is sandy. There is a very high probability that it will be eroded very fast in the event of a flood and might pose danger to the shelter. How do we ensure that soil is not eroded. Some of the ideas that I have come across is putting the sand bags on the periphery, planting of trees and grass. I would request the community members to enlighten us on this also.
In Orissa, Orissa State Disaster Management Authority(OSDMA) has constructed 97 Multipurpose Cyclone/Flood Shelters in 6 coastal districts 41 more are under construction out of Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund. Indian Red Cross Society, Orissa Branch has also constructed 65 Multipurpose Cyclone Shelters.
A survey was conducted through IIT, Kharagpur in 6 coastal districts and adjoining areas of Chilika lagoon to identify the locations for Cyclone Shelters. IIT, Kharagpur has suggested 370 locations (286 in 6 coastal districts + 84 around Chilika lake) with capacity for construction of Cyclone Shelters. The basic features in deciding the location and capacity are:
The basic design features of the shelter buildings are: -
Community Based Cyclone Shelter Management and Maintenance Committees (CSMMCs) includes local administration and representatives from NGO and Women SHG and few members from SC & ST communities and takes the charge of day-to-day management and maintenance of the building. Most of the buildings have been constructed in School premises so that the buildings could be used for School purposes during normal time. The CSMMC has also been authorized to put the building for economic / community uses like community house/ hall , kaliyan mandap, used for any type of community function etc. and earn user fees. The amount so earned is kept in a joint account and as and when necessary spent for the purpose of maintenance of the building.
As these places are used for safe shelter government of Orissa has decided to equip them with the following equipments , which will be useful during or post disaster time:
The CSMMC members and Village Disaster Management Teams like DMT on first-aid and DMT on search & rescue have been trained to operate the equipments under DRM Programme. 25 volunteers per shelter have been trained on first-aid techniques by the trainers from St. John Ambulance. Similarly 25 volunteers per shelter have been imparted training on search & rescue techniques by the trainers from Civil Defence organization. The shelters have also been given a linkage with the Village, Gram Panchayat and Block level DM plans prepared under the DRM Programme.
I hope the information will be useful.
Greetings from India!
In India after the Orissa Super Cyclone (29th October, 1999) a large number of cyclone shelters were constructed in the coastal districts (administrative division). These districts apart from being prone to cyclone are also prone to severe floods every year. The cyclone shelters constructed with the support of various organisations are now used as multi purpose cyclone shelters. In some places that are used as schools and also community centers
The type of construction that we see of these shelters too vary. Some shelters are on raised lands and have stilts. This helps the community to have their livestock secured in the basement and the community can stay on the first floor and some are circular/hexagonal in shape so that it can resist strong wind. The maintenance of these shelters is now done by the community.
The same approach may be used in Bangladesh by Oxfam also.
Panchayat Bhawan can be used as shelters during disasters and in the remaining time these can be used as a community centers as in case of city we organise functions etc in the convention centers. These shelters should be maintained by the panchayat of that village. To make these panchayat bhawan self sustainable, there shall be a charge for using this premises for any ceremony or function.
The construction of these shelters cum community centers has to be done in caution as these have to adequate for both the purposes. layout & construction shall be done in full consultation with the community.
In many village, Panchayat Bhawan are constructed by the Mukhiya (Gram Pradhan) and are being used for all kind of purposes.
One learns by failures and we have learnt from one. Since one is talking about Bangladesh (Floods, Hurricanes) like to highlight what you may like to consider adopting and not adopting. One assumption is that you are talking of Rural Bangladesh, akin to Indian villages.
The design of the structure itself is the key for its maintenance and regular use. Cement concrete structures are often found (especially in flood and hurricane areas) to have low acceptability (?) despite the highest order of protection they provide. Essentiality being it is a “community” asset and we have often romanticised the concept of community.
In a CC structure, by the very design the community can participate only in the “where” part of the decision (if any) since the “What” has already been decided by us and the “How” and “How much” decide the “when”, all external to the communities.
Therefore, what we have done is:
o They found market for their bamboo (economics)
o They found that they could protect their cattle with their own produce
o The load on the shelter was their own immediate neighbourhood and not the 500 Households of the entire village.
o A new meeting space, place to celebrate was found. They would find many more uses.
Regarding the revenue model, I have not considered this as a revenue earning model than a revenue saving model. Reasons being (a)the prices of the Grain and the Hay at the time of harvest and in the time of need having a variance of 3-5 times, local income generation for artisans, providing a market to local resources and saving of livestock. In North Bihar, people sold away their cattle not because they did not want them but because there was no fodder available. They originally bought them between 8-10 thousand rupees each, sold away at a maximum of 2500-3000 to the butcher, and are now facing a shortage of milk and therefore cattle and so are to invest another eight thousand. Cumulative loss being in the range of 13-15 thousand rupees!!
You may like to attempt it with one prototype and even in unlikely event of the entire concept failing, the loss is about 5,00,000 taka all inclusive for a neighbourhood of about 20-25 families. This structure of the shelter may not be appropriate for a Storm Surge.
The second example is in Nadia and Murshidabad districts of West Bengal. Majority of the houses, which were made of mud, were washed away by a devastating flood in 2000. Through a community-centred process in which the communities took the lead, all houses destroyed were rebuilt. All the houses and other common shelters were rebuilt on raised plinths above the highest flood level. Since the area is extremely low-lying with high probability of even more severe floods, the design and materials used for housing have also been changed. The walls are made of tins, 'darma' (a local weed used for walls in the regions), interwoven jute sticks or bricks in accordance to the economic status of each family. The materials used are cut into small square or rectangular pieces and nailed on bamboo and screwed together. This has been done so that on receipt of early warning ( have an excellent early warning system in place ), they can dismantle the house in a few hours, tie them up and put it on top of very tall, strong trees on bamboo platforms (the bamboos are stored from before) and the families then proceed to their respective identified shelters or live during the floods in raised scaffolds (locally called 'machans'). It was a conscious decision of the community of not being dependent on external aid for rebuilding houses after each disaster. Each family also prepare family emergency kits which give them enough ration and other essentials to survive for 7 - 10 days without any external relief. The women members also know how to raise tubewells (which help the tubewells not be damaged) and have source of clean drinking water during floods when families live on scaffolds. This is also a totally community based initiative
I really appreciate your efforts for raising such an important issue before the community of practice the discussion will enhance and straighten community response here are few links which contents very useful information on the topic.
>How women's concerns are shaped in community-based disaster risk management in Bangladesh this documents basically elaborates on how concerns regarding gender in community-based disaster risk management are shaped through interaction between local agents of development and communities in Bangladesh. As women and men have different experiences in disaster, gender concerns should be fully addressed by the community and integrated in the action they take up to reduce disaster risks. The term 'local agents of development' refers to individuals engaged in implementation of development policy in their own community. Recent trends in community-based disaster risk management policy seek what is called a 'whole community approach' engaging various stakeholders such as traditional village elite, 'local civil society' and leaders of community-based organizations - mostly poor villagers supported by non-governmental organizations. Within the context of the historical evolution of community development approaches in Bangladesh, this is quite new in terms of bringing together traditional leaders and poor target groups including women's groups. By drawing from the experience of women and focusing on the functioning of local agents of development during the flood of 2004, the author aims to assess the gaps between the primary concerns of women and those taken up in the risk-reduction action, to see whether, why, and when they have widened or been bridged hope this will be useful for you and your team.
You have raised a very interesting debate on construction of shelters , their maintenance by revenue model adoption and many more. There are many agencies working in this area and contributing in this direction. Similarly while working for Care India at Patna Bihar I have also come across some of these issues and tried to resolve it.
First comes, that which type of shelter an agency want to construct and what is the target population. A lot depends upon the project design and cost estimate of project and availability of raw materials. You are aware that cost of construction for shelters can start from 10,000 to 100000 and based upon that appropriate design can be selected . While working in the flood prone area apart from flood, generally one should take consideration of earth quake zone of the particular area .
The local community can be involve in the site selection and purchasing of building material to maintain the transparency of work. They can also be useful to obtain the land patta from the government officials. Authentication of piece of land from the government site will also be important task to do. Use of local materials in shelter construction should taken be encouraged. We have used lots of bamboos in shelter construction and get a good result. While selecting the beneficiaries gender, disability factor can also be counted . Installation of hand pumps based around shelters and provision of toilet along with small kitchen would serve the community better. But the most important after the construction the target beneficiaries should have an orientation of how to use the facilities given during peace time and during an emergency, along with some do's and don'ts. For firsthand experience I suggest to visit the site where these works have already been completed .
When we design shelter for flood affected areas, now days the house constructed on stilt and mostly the structure is made by wood, timber or by steel. This we adopted in Delta area of Myanmar, affected by Cyclone Nargis area. The structure is bamboo and wooden type and required less maintenance. we (IFRC)also develop maintenance guidelines based on traditional knowledge and availability of local material for these shelter.
Thanks for raising an important matter like this for discussion. Let me share the experience of Orissa so far as construction of Cyclone Shelters in the aftermath of the Super Cyclone (1999) is concerned.
Around 120 such shelter buildings have been constructed with participation of communities in the stages of site selection, construction, handing over, management and maintenance, and actual use during disaster period.
The buildings are normally two storey buildings with stilted structure. The technical designs and specifications were finalised by IIT Kharagpur. The requirement was assessed through field survey taking into account two story safe buildings (both government and private) available, floor space available, population of the villages, gap etc through a grid analysis. These were constructed on government/public land where normally schools were functioning prior to cyclone and later on were damaged. The strategy was to construct multi-purpose building for use by community members in normal period for other activities so that these available in usable condition during a disaster period. The exact site/location is selected through community level meetings. The community supervises construction taken up by Orissa Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA). These buildings have all basic facilities for shelter of women, children, PwDs and others. It has separate hall for men and women. It has a ramp for use by elderly people and PwDs.
UNDP facilitated accessibility audit of a few shelter buildings with help of Handicap International. This had led to a few more suggestions to provide barrier free access.
After these building constructed, these are handed over to User Communities through a Cyclone Shelter Management and Maintenance Committee (CSMMC). The CSMMC is headed by the local Block Development officer where as all operational / management / maintenance activities are coordinated by the Secretary-a community volunteer.
Funds are placed with this committee for maintenance of the Shelter. The CSMMC can use put the shelter to various activities during normal period and collect user fees as per the guidelines of the Government. The user fees are used for maintenance activities.
The CSMMC undertook training of volunteers n search an rescue and first aid with the support of UNDP under the GoI-UDP Disaster Risk Management Programme UNDP has also supplied some basic SAR equipment like lifebuoys and life jackets etc as well as jackets to volunteers (for better visibility). UNDP and OSDMA facilitated organisation of community level mock drills in these shelters. Now mock drills are being conducted every year on 19th June.
UNDP further facilitated creation of a Corpus Fund at the shelter level so that interest accrued could be utilised towards, capacity building programme, preparation and updating of shelter level disaster management plans and similar activities.
These Shelters form an important aspect of Panchayat /Block/District level Disaster Management Plans. At the state level, OSDMA coordinates with these shelters for their strengthening and sustainability.
Greetings from Mumbai !
At present I am working as the State Project Officer of the ongoing GoI-UNDP DRR Programme in Maharashtra, India. Before the present assignment, for the period 1999-2003, I had the opportunity of working as the Camp Officer for the Orissa Super Cyclone Rehabilitation Project of the Government of Maharashtra. You might be aware that in the aftermath of killer super cyclone in 1999 (naming of Indian Ocean cyclones had not started by then) , Government of Maharashtra had adopted the worst affected district of Jagatsinghpur and constructed, inter alia, 101 numbers of Multi Purpose Cyclone shelters.In response to your query, I would like to suggest the following few points from my experience, for your consideration.
Community participation must be ensured from the very beginning. Safe location, suitable site need to be decided based on their experience and prudence. Type of material to be used the design, location of sanitation block, water source, height of the plinth, material to be used and best suited for the location, may be finalized in consultation with the community. The villagers may be encouraged for Shramdaan which will inculcate a sense of belongingness in their mind, For instance, in Orissa, we persuaded the villagers to work at least for the curing work of the shelter during their leisure time.
The peace time use and mode of use of shelters may also be decided as per their suggestions. As already described by Ms Kalika, one of the alternatives could be collection of user fees. For example, Government of Maharashtra constituted a committee of villagers for the upkeep and maintenance of the shelters. The building and premises could be rented to any one for holding cultural or social events, after depositing a security amount and payment of certain amount.
As a poor substitute , the cost of construction may include the cost of constituting a corpus.
Hope, this will be useful for you.
Greetings and many thanks for sharing your ideas on flood shelter. It is becoming a very enriching discussion with views coming from very diverse set of people.
There are three types of flood shelters that I have come across.
We are a Ngo implementing environmental upgradation projects since 2001, in the field of Water-shed, waste- management, greening and providing Eco-Literacy in communities, in order that the community partakes in the project and easily and takes-over the operation and maintainance of each inititiative beyond the project funding phase.
In the last 10 years or so, we have implemented varied environmental projects, viz. decentralised management of storm/ rain water management using rain- water harvesting - recharging the ground - water or storing and re-using rain water. Waste water is remedied using natural methods and the recycled water is used for lower- end uses. for irrigation, flushing toilets, and others. Bio- waste is convertred into compost/ manure and used for organic- farming herbs, medicinal plants etc..Eco- san toilets have also been done. Also Waterless Urinals with use of urine for fertigation of farms etc.. ELP- Eco-Literacy Programs are practiced in communities, to bring about awareness and protecting nature- in natural mode.
In all these, we have observed that community awareness and participation right from the start till end and also in all the phases of the project is important. All initiatives to be assessed, is it community centric and friendly, hand- holding at difficult times, and provide rewards - appreciation when the success is reached, are important.
At no time should the community feel that they are left in the lurch, also benefits should acrue and translate into enhancing the quality of life- living, livelihood, uplift economic and educational levels, Appropriate training for all levels, to be ensured.
Specifics of solid and liquid waste management can be offered, and also with re-use of produces, etc.
Now comimg to the priciples and practices, Flood- shelters and accessories to be traditional, and easy to build and maintain, using native- knowledge and artisinal literacy available in communities. Our Ngo is for small, decentralised units, which individuals can manage, We have also pilotted - a controlled open defecation models, and human solid waste co-composted with dairy waste and used in farm fertigation..for small farm- holdings, vegetables, fruits etc..All wastes should in some form be used as a resource- wealth generating.
Certain adaptable principles and practices can be introduced which have been well- proven in similar site conditions. Fish culture techniques, hardy rice- cultivation can be introduced.Training of trainers to be practiced. Literacy levels to be up-graded.Some business practices which have flourished viz. local tourism, hand-crafts, special farm- and fish produces whch have been traditional to be sustained. SHGs to be formed with local Govt. Administration and FIs support, some passionate corporates should offer timely assistance, as a Corporate Social Responsibility- CSR etc..
In nearby district towns to these flood affected areas, if there are UG- colleges, youth volunteers to be chosen, and given work as interns to work along with the communities, they would gain by work- experience and some stipends etc..
HR- assets in communities to be up-graded. We have a concept termed as Community Asset Management: which calls for over-all growth in communities, and its strengths.Ideally holistic growth to be ensured, the Traditional arrt and culture to be encouraged.
Our Members who have had similar experiences in Kosi-Flood affected areas,may be encouraged to offer their experiences, which can be adapted to suit the areas being addressed in this discussion.
We have to come together and offer our help, in whatever way one can.
I am from Lutheran world service India trust, Tamilnadu ,Tsunami Response Programme. In our Tsunami response programme we have constructed several emergency shelters for the Tsuanmi affected and also flood affected community in Cuddalore and Nagapattinam Districts of Tamilandu State. From our experience I would like to response your query
Site selection is one of the important aspect. In below some of the criteria given for site selection for your reference.
Hope this will be helpful to your project.
With reference to the four critical issues which are the subject of your query, you may wish to refer to several papers which were produced in the process leading up to the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), one specific paper which I find relevant to these issues, can be accessed through the link that is produced below entitled: Linking Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management – Policy Challenges and Opportunities prepared jointly by DFID, EC, UNDP and the World Bank:
http://www.sarpn.org.za/wssd/protagonists/pr_em/WSSD_Paper_Final_Version.pdf
I would like to share my learnings and experience of distributing shelter and food materials in Bela, Babuan and Basmatia block of the Araria district of Bihar that is close to the borders of the Bangladesh, though the context of the flood in terms of reason are different for the year 2008 when Bihar and Nepal saw the devastation. Not sure , how much impact it had in Bangladesh.Grassroots India Trust ,a new Delhi based organization coordinated the relief with the support of Islamic Relief the shelters that I saw were the local Shelters in the village created locally for time being ( generally pucca houses in the rural areas are the first choice for shelter during flood as people use roof for staying there for some time till they are rescued , large and small Government supported Relief Camps will the essential supplies and Private Releif Camps managed by the social, religious and cultural organizations. In the district of Araria, I learnt that Imarat Sharia Bihar and its district unit there were the first to reach and rescue people from the heavy flow of the waters with the help of people who could swim and boats. Massive destruction of crops along with loss of lives were reported. In one of the village near Sursar, an entire embankment collapsed that was relatively higher than the other places.
I need to relate more on the stories of horror from Bihar more as this is quite well known. Responding to the queries , I would like to share my responses below the questions.
Both height of the place and type of soil should be kept in mind while choosing the location of the centre along with other logistic support for location such as distance from the the submerged zone, railway station, bus stand and markets. In case the shelter is for a long time then facilities for child protection,education etc also needs to be considered. Permanent oustees need a special package and for them total habitation support is needed with place of residence etc. In 2008, I had seen Government of Bihar constructing such places as permanent shelters.
Children ,disabled and women need all the support that they would got in normal days. Anganwadi support for children in the age group of 3-6 and primary education support for children in the age group of 6-14 should be given along with support for children in age group of 14-18. Children and youths in case of permanant oustees need special packages for ensuring that their prospects for education and career advancement does not get harmed.
Community participation is critical for ensuring sustainability of the shelter .Without support of the community, shelters may not get the attention that it deserves and ownership would be built. Community participation can be ensured through discussing the design and structure with the involvement of community leaders reprsenting the various social and religious groups ensuring inclusive justice. Stakeholder analysis at the community level need to be inclusive in order to ensure that no social group feels excluded. Genger justice should be the cross cutting concern and in case there are communities sensitivity to purdah, women led community processes should be ensured. Responding to the second part of the question, I would like to share that facilities created should include food storage, community shelter, water, sanitation and education facilities along with ECCE centres.
Considering the special situation of the community, I would suggest public support for the these shelters
Endeavoring for ecological safety ,social inclusion and distributive justice for the renewable resource based livelihoods and habitats, Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion and Governance (CEASIG) , an initiative of Labour League Foundation, Sewa and Sufi Trust , Delhi aims for socially inclusive and ecologically safe future for all through organizing and communicating carbon neutral neighborhood discussions/ consultations, building capacities in ecological audit, ecologically safe networking ,advocacy, interfaith dialogue & other related domains for multiplying personal, community , governmental and corporate actions for ecologically safe education, ecological audit ,and, ecologically safe and socially inclusive governance.
Contact Details: 58-C,DDA Flats, Ashok Vihar-III, Delhi-110052
Phones: 0968345380
Copyrighted under Creative Commons License “Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5”. Re-users of this material must cite as their source Solution Exchange as well as the item’s recommender, if relevant, and must share any derivative work with the Solution Exchange Community.
Solution Exchange was a UN initiative for development practitioners in India. For more information please visit http://in.one.un.org/page/un-solution-exchange/ Please note that some of the links in these discussions may be defunct.