Power crisis: Time to go green

Hydro energy is a leading source of power in India. With severe water crisis looming large, isn't it time for us to look at renewable energy options?
Tehri, a hydropower dam in Uttarakhand (Source: Mayank Gupta, Wikimedia Commons) Tehri, a hydropower dam in Uttarakhand (Source: Mayank Gupta, Wikimedia Commons)

Despite the severe water management crisis India is going through, hydro energy continues to be the second leading source of power, next only to thermal-based energy in the country. Hydropower generates over 16 percent of India’s electricity.

But how sustainable is hydropower? Is it clean, green and renewable, as many experts say? Will moving away from hydropower reduce our carbon footprint in the years to come?

India’s hydropower potential stands at 84,000 megawatt (MW) at 60 percent load factor while the sector’s installed capacity is 42,623.42 MW for large hydro and 4,147 MW for small hydro as per data from Central Electricity Authority as on December 31, 2015. This amounts to 16.45 percent of the total installed capacity of 2,84,303.39 MW.  In India, the hydropower plants operate at barely 32 percent of its capacity.

Hydropower to meet energy deficit

Large dams are advocated by many to meet both water and energy security. As per the International Hydropower Association’s response in an article by G. Venkatesh titled, Renewable, But Is It Sustainable? India ranks fourth in the world, behind Russia, China and Canada, in terms of hydropower potential that is yet to be developed. In the article, he says, “On the basis of proportional use of hydropower potential, India has developed far less than the norm for the developed world… Much of the undeveloped potential is in the northern and northeastern states along the southern Himalayas.” 

Hydropower is hardly a ‘renewable’ source in the first place. Moreover, the unfettered expansion of hydropower has many hazards. It impacts the local community and the ecosystem in many ways.

“Hydropower is seen as clean in terms of air pollution, but the ecological impact of any dam on a river is immense, irreparable and long lasting. The government just sees the direct cost-benefit ratio in terms of money invested and the revenue generated and assumes all negative impacts can be mitigated through technology and compensation, which is really unfortunate,” says Debadityo Sinha, a Delhi-based conservation activist and filmmaker.

“Large hydropower dam underperforms its stated installed capacity because the actual flow in the river is much less than the design flows due to continuous deforestation in the catchments of the rivers. Deforestation also results in an increase in the silt load, which reduces the storage capacity and the life of these dams. Besides, there are many other environmental and social costs associated with large hydropower dams, all of which affect its sustainability,” says Indore-based social activist and development researcher, Rahul Banerjee.

“Each source of power has sector-specific and site-specific benefits. What we are increasingly noticing is erratic weather, where the number of rainy days is decreasing while the intensity of the rainfall is increasing. What the stream flows could be like in the next 10-20 years makes hydropower a risky proposition, purely from a financial perspective, leave aside other social and environmental impacts,” says Bharat Lal Seth, South Asia program coordinator of International Rivers, a US-based organisation working to halt destructive river infrastructure projects.

“There has been a slowdown in the growth of the hydropower segment, a sector that was earlier poised to meet significant energy demand in the next few years,” says Parineeta Dandekar of South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP). The organisation has been pushing for performance appraisal of large hydropower projects in India for some years.

Dandekar points to an analysis by SANDRP, based on figures from Central Electricity Authority, on how the power generation per MW installed hydro capacity has gone down by over 20 percent in the last two decades and that 89 percent of existing projects have underperformed, even when rainfall has been average or above average in most of the years under consideration.

“Hydropower did not turn out to be a money spinner as many project developers expected. Developers made an unfounded prediction on water availability in reservoirs making pumped storages perfect for meeting peak demand in the electricity grid. This was clearly an overestimation,” says Dandekar. Also, this turned out to be a big fiasco in economic terms.

“The affected people have continued to protest for long-term sustainability, environmental and social aspects of the projects, the most notable mass protests and public outcry in recent years being in the northeast in projects like Lower Subansiri and Tawang. Even some small hydro projects in Himachal Pradesh met with fierce, sustained opposition. Yet the government went ahead with the projects,” Dandekar adds.

Chipilima hydropower dam, Odisha (Source: Subhasisa Panigrahi, Wikimedia Commons)

A report by Pricewaterhouse Coopers India, a consulting group for the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, a body which articulates industry’s concerns in an article titled Hydropower in India: Key enablers for a better tomorrow puts the reasons for negative investment sentiment in hydro sector on factors such as “environmental concerns, resettlement and rehabilitation issues, land acquisition problems, long clearance and approval procedures, capability of developers, etc”. Dandekar disagrees that these have contributed to the slow pace of hydropower development in the recent past. “The slack is not due to hindrances in getting environmental clearances, which have been made quicker even in the absence of basin studies and cumulative impact assessments of projects. The government, as usual, continues to be unconcerned about the needs of the river, and the people in the submergence and catchment area,” she adds.

While hydropower is promoted in the name of climate change mitigation and to do away with the negative effects (like pollution) of using fossil fuels for power, hydropower has come under criticism due to carbon dioxide and methane emissions beyond acceptable limits. Hydropower projects make the impact of climate-related disasters worse. “Unprecedented rainfall and fragile Himalayan geology combine to pose safety risk to all riverine infrastructure as we have seen during the Uttarakhand floods in 2013 where many hydropower projects, be it their barrages or tunnels, were damaged and in some cases, exacerbated the impacts of the flood,” says Seth.

Dandekar points to the incident in 100 MW Sorang hydropower project in Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh where a burst in penstock pipe left three people dead and played havoc with the livelihoods of people in the villages nearby. “The deluge washed away homes, cattle sheds and village farms leaving at least three people dead, four missing, several injured and hundreds of livestock washed away” (SANDRP, 2015). “There is a need to have adequate safety standards and a credible mechanism to monitor the quality of ongoing construction in hydropower projects to prevent mishaps such as these,” she adds.

Move from hydropower to renewable energy

Isn’t it time to move away from hydropower and look at new options in renewable energy? What’s stopping renewable energy sector in the country from picking up in a way it should be? “I think we need to look at pushing renewable options like rooftop solar. The government continues to push for unviable large hydro with all kinds of incentives. But renewable energy is catching up fast. The government also needs to go for peak power demand management measures and also towards optimising power from existing capacity,” says Himanshu Thakkar, founder of SANDRP. 

“To generate electricity for a few decades, we are killing a river's fragile ecosystem forever which could have given livelihood to fishermen of the river basin for eternity. And it is happening when we have more efficient technologies to harvest solar energy,” says Sinha.

“Now that wind and solar power development is becoming more viable technically and financially, we need to opt for them given their lower social and environmental footprint,” says Dandekar. She adds that the capacity of renewable energy at 42,850 MW has recently overtaken large hydropower.

Is there a shift of policy in the country?

“There is already a definite swing, including the government policy and efforts, to move away from hydropower and look at new options in renewable energy. Power minister Piyush Goyal has even been quoted as saying that the country did not need hydropower for the next 10 years. Given the social and environmental impacts, perhaps it is time to issue a moratorium on further projects. Already, several large hydropower projects are stalled, be it for social, environmental, or financial reasons. These issues must be resolved before statutory clearances for new projects are given,” says Seth.

“The cost of generation of conventional energy, be it thermal or hydro, is low given that the social and environmental costs are not accounted for. We need to look at the real cost per unit while comparing it with renewable energy,” says Dandekar.

But not everybody pitches for solar and wind energy. Seth says, “Renewables too have their own impediments. For instance, solar plants are viable in Rajasthan, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh but not equally so in parts of Arunachal Pradesh or Uttarakhand. Large solar or wind farms require large tracts of land, acquisition of which can often impede progress.”

Seth points out that blindly setting up more power plants, including renewable projects, is not the need of the hour as capacity wise, India is set to become an energy surplus nation. “India needs to focus on energy dark zones, resolve transmission bottlenecks, set up more decentralised power and smart grids, as well as look to improve efficiencies and curb demand,” he adds. 

“Within the renewable energy, the best and the least developed option is the anaerobic incineration (pyrolisis) of biomass produced both in forests, wastelands and farms. This is much less polluting and carbon contributing than fossil fuel-based energy but has the same energy intensity as them. Moreover, this can be produced in a decentralised manner and reduce the losses and costs of transmission and distribution,” says Banerjee.

“There are problems in shifting towards renewable options,” says Dr M.P. Sharma, professor and head, Alternate Hydro Energy Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee. “Firstly, there is a lack of proper coordination among different agencies, particularly, the implementing agencies and the ministry of new and renewable energy. Awareness among people about renewable energy is lacking. Nor is there adequate backup to address the problems faced by users. There are problems in commercialisation and implementation of renewable energy projects, limiting their viability,” he says.

To make developers shift to production of renewable energy like wind or solar, the government has to throw in more fiscal incentives, says Dandekar.  Till then, let’s wait and watch!

Attachments

Sub-Categories

Regions

Subscribe to <none>