You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.

Unhappy news from new studies on India's groundwater

Two articles in scientific journals recently analyzed satellite data and came up with similiar alarming results for the depletion of India's groundwater in the Indo-Gangetic basin:

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/810/1 is an article based on a research paper in the Geophysical Research Letters by a team including geophysicist Virendra Tiwari of National Geophysical Research Institute.

And IEEE Spectrum talks about a paper in Nature that covers the same ground:
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/satellites/satellites-peer-into-indias


Quoting from Richard Kerr's article in the Science Mag link above:

"The big picture of Indian groundwater comes from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission, launched in March 2002 as a joint effort by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the German Aerospace Center. Actually two satellites orbiting in tandem 220 kilometers apart, GRACE measures subtle variations in the pull of Earth's gravity by using microwaves to precisely gauge the changing distance between the two spacecraft.
As the lead spacecraft passes over a patch of anomalously strong gravity, it accelerates ahead of the trailing spacecraft. Once past the anomaly, the lead satellite slows back down. Then the trailing spacecraft accelerates and again closes on the leader. By making repeated passes over the same spot, GRACE measures changes in Earth's gravity, which are mainly due to water moving on and under the surface. ..
Outside of wasting ice sheets, the world's largest broad-scale decline in gravity during GRACE's first 6 years came across a 2.7-million-square-kilometer, east-west swath centered on New Delhi. That's according to a study in press in Geophysical Research Letters by geophysicists Virendra Tiwari of the National Geophysical Research Institute in Hyderabad, India; John Wahr of the University of Colorado, Boulder; and Sean Swenson of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder. Adjusted for natural variations due to changing precipitation and evaporation, the decline in gravity that GRACE determined equates to a net loss of 54 plus or minus 9 cubic kilometers of groundwater per year, the group reports. That would produce a fall in the water table of about 10 centimeters per year averaged over the entire region.
A falling water table across the northern Indian subcontinent comes as no great surprise. The GRACE region of sharp groundwater depletion coincides with the world's most intensely irrigated land: Fifty percent to more than 75% of the land is equipped for irrigation with pumped groundwater or reservoir water. And then there are those 600 million people drawing heavily on groundwater. But, the group calculates, the GRACE-determined depletion rate implies that groundwater was being pumped out 70% faster in this decade than the Central Ground Water Board of India estimated it was in the mid-1990s. The apparent surge in withdrawal would have been large enough to turn a once-stable water table into a falling one that demands ever-deeper wells and bigger pumps and may draw in salty or polluted water."

Questions that come to mind:
========
** How reliable are these results? This is pretty much the first attempt to deduce groundwater status information from gravity change data. How are the results to be seen in this situation ?
** We already knew that groundwater depletion was a big problem. Is this study corraborative or conflicting with other sources of information ? For eg. the article above says that the rate of groundwater extraction is 70% more than CGWB's estimates for the mid-90s ? Can someone explicate on this ?
** Groundwater depletion was also seen as a big problem in peninsular India, whereas these results say the problem is worst in N.India
** If anyone can forward hard or softcopies of the orignal articles to the Water Portal, these can be made available to the wider public.

A note from Himanshu Thakkar of SANDRP on the above can be seen at:
http://www.indiawaterportal.org/blog/2009/08/17/alarm-bell-on-groundwater-its-not-bottomless/

We request all who are competent in the above areas to comment !

Tags:

Comments

1. Message from Mr.Chetan

Message from Mr.Chetan Pandit
As the saying goes, half knowledge is a dangerous thing. Internet places information in public domain, where it may be read by any one, including those who are not necessarily competent to evaluate it. An information sheet that often accompanies prescription medicines, clearly says “For use by a Registered Medical Practitioner Only”. One wishes that the authors of the two recent articles on depletion of ground water in North India had placed some similar warning – “For use by a competent hydrologist only”.

In science, when a new idea is being explored, it is a folly to accord the status of “confirmed truth” on the initial reports. The first outcome is to be taken as only a hypothesis, i.e. a mere possibility being placed on the table for independent confirmation. From hypothesis to theory is a long journey, and not every hypothesis completes it. The best recent example is the claim of cold fusion.

The report about depletion of GW in north India is at present only a
hypothesis. There are several things unexplained in it.

1. It is an indirect conclusion – measurements of gravity are being
correlated to movement of ground water. When such correlation is proposed as a new idea, initially it requires a verification by what is known as “ground truth”. i.e. at some places actual direct measurements should be made and compared with indirect inferences. This does not seem to have been done.

2. It shows the area south of Narmada as gaining GW. This does not
correspond with the “ground truth” as we know it.

3. In fact, in the northern region also it doesn’t match the ground truth. The depletion is shown to extend right across Bhutan. Sikkim is shown in -4 cm/Y zone while in Bhuan it ranges from -3.5 cm/Y in the west to -2 cm/Y in east. These can hardly be called “intensely GW irrigated” lands.

4. The information available does not seem to make a distinction between dynamic GW and static GW.

5. Mere pumping and irrigation should not change the local gravity
measurements. If the water use efficiency is around 30%, then 70% of the water goes back in to the aquifer. Therefore if 54 bcm corresponds to the quantity of water that has moved away, causing a change in gravity, then the quantity pumped would be about 180 bcm/Y, and this is unacceptably high.

Thus, while GW depletion should be high on our list of concerns, it would be alarmist to take this report at face value. Let the experts examine it first.

Chetan Pandit

2. Dear Sir, We believe our

Dear Sir,

We believe our "Watershed A to Z" software ready for 13 States would greatly help solve this problem.

I invite serious enquiries for its use in any State.

Kind Regards.

Bhushan Ambadkar
Director

Cell: 0 9850037817

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Arghyam

6.22-2011.07.01-06